24 Apr 2009

Joao Mariano Saldanha, PhD, Sidadaun Portugés

Iha kraik ne'e mak Joao Mariano Saldanha nia CV ho kontratu iha Ministerio das Finanças:

Dokumentu sira seluk bele haree iha Tempo Semanal nia blog.

Tansa mak Joao Mariano Saldanha, PhD, dehan nia ne'e ema Portugal???

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ah koitado!!!!,hateten los deit saaaa. Mariano Saldanha ida uluk la kohi temi Timor atu ukun an ne'e kaaaaa. Halo nusa mak nia ema Portugal fali, se nia uluk defende mate mean los otonomia mak dalan diak ona ba Timor-Timur ? Sidadun Indonesia karik?

Anonymous said...

154.000 USD sedauk too 200 000 ema mate tan defende ukun rasik an. Joao Saldanha se aumenta nia gaji..........
Maubere Foho

Anonymous said...

NIA REGISTU NIA AN NUDAR EMA PORTUGAL HODI SIMU SALARIU INTERNATIONAL STAFF NIAN ho US $11,000 kada fulan (SEBELAS RIBUH US DOLLAR PER BULAN). SE NIA REGISTU NUDAR NATIONALIDADE TIMOR-LESTE ANTAUN NIA SALARAIU HANESAN TUIR LOKAL STAFF NIAN. IMPORTANTE ATU ITA INVESTIGA MAK NE'E: CHECK IHA EMBASADA PORTUGAL, JOAO M. SALDANHA SAI ONA CIDADADAUN PORTUGUES KA LAE?

IMPORTANTE MOS ATU ITA DEBATE MAK: PANTAS KA LA'E ADVISOR TIMOR OAN BELE SIMU SALARIO BO'OT HANESAN NE'E?

Batina Mutin

Anonymous said...

quitado!! ema sira hanesan ne'e buka diak e chupa timor nia riku soin deit, sira nem hakarak atu hatene timor nia susar e terus. juventude resistencia sira hamriik ba defende ita nia rain e riku soin timor nian hosi ema hanesan mariano saldanha cs tamba agora dadaun ema outonomista ho estrangeiro sira sobu ita unidade nacional para bele nauk riqueja rai doben timor nian. viva timor leste..!! a luta continua!!

Anonymous said...

Sim, Irmaun Batina Mutin, ita nia lei inan/ constitusaun bele fo dalan ba ema Timor hodi hili nasionalidade rua ho Australia ou Portugal. Maibe hau hanoin fila ba kotuk karik naton Mariano Saldanha hari nia Partido Republikanu ne'e parese ho kartaun registu Timor nian mak ba registu iha Ministeriu Justisa laos ho bilhete identidade Portugues.

Timor oan hotu-hotu nebe mak hela iha rai liur k iha rai laran mak ho gelar mesak boooot hanesan Prof.Dr. Saldanha no lalais troka kartaun hanesan ne'e, hau hanoin katak ema lubuk oan hirak ne'e sei sai riku hotu iha Timor i Timor sira nebe mak ho ekperensia itoan ka ita nia inan aman sira nebe moris iha tos ka natar sei kiak ba nafatin, Amen

Anonymous said...

Blog ne so Insulta ema deit,blog ne sempre hakarek laran moras ema nia keberhasilan i inveja los deit.la iha argumento ida diak ba ita nia rai so mai koalia ema nia ha'at deit.
Salam
Neko

Anonymous said...

Felix de Jesus, hau sente ita bot konfuju ituan ho blog AMP forum haksesuk karik? Iha forum ne ita bot sira buka atu taka deit korupsaun iha AMP laran e tenta dezvia atensaun. Imi buka mak difama deit ema nebe opos AMP ho xanana. Felix, imi hotu mesak koruptos deit tanba imi apoia mate mean koruptor sira iha regime AMP.

Ba blog ida ne hau fo hau nia parabens no kontinua ho servisu diak nebe imi halo.

Ba katuas Felix de Jesus, hare ba estuda hotu fila ona mai timor. Keta katuas namlaik deit iha Portugal. Mai Timor hanesan imi nia maluk Portugues Dr. Joao Mariano Saldanha.

Obrigada.
Lurdes

Anonymous said...

uluk mari alkatiri dehan saida....
BOLSU sei kuak barak....rekurso humano sei fraku....ita lao neneik lai...
Kuando hakarak ansi mak nune....bolsu kuak sira agora laos prepara an maibe naok namanas hela.
se mak bele hatau dehan labele....ita rasik mak hakarak mudansa maibe mudansa ba raikuak fali laos ba rai leten atu hodi ses husi susar.

Anonymous said...

kuando ita hare fali ba politik uluk 2002-2005 ita dehan uluk ne at liu tamba sira mesak beik ten lahatene ukun e sira lahatene saida mak manajemen, ne tamba naoek ten sira agora ne mak koalia, tan ne agora sira aporveita matenek nain sira nebe agora urus nasaun ne atu hodi sira naok....matenek nain sira agora hanoin dehan ukun ne gampang....agora mak foin sente katak KKN ne laos iha deit fatin ida maibe iha fatin hotu-hotu iha.
ne so justica popular ida mak bele hamos hotu lalaok at ida ne.

Anonymous said...

Camaradas no buiberes sira mak hau hadomi,
HATE NE SE MAK AGORA KAER UKUN???????? AMP........LIU HUSI NINIA LIDERANSA xANANA gUSMAO.....AGORA TEMPU ATU NAOK RAME RAME TAMBA TUIR MAI FALI NE'E LAIHA ONA.........MALUK SIRA LALIKA LARAN TARIDU AGORA MOS IHA TEMPU BA ITA ATU TRATA BI IHA EMBASADA PORTUGAL NIAN IHA TIMOR ATU NUNE'E ITA BELE SAI EMA PORTUGUESE........E DIAK LIU AGORA ITA BA ESKOLA ATU NUNE'E IHA TINAN 5 OIN MAI ITA MAK KAER UKUN...

MUNDU PERDIDO

BOMBASTICK99 said...

Neko sira nia blog FH mak makas duni, ita koment iha neba mos lafo sai.. sensor makas loss.

Anonymous said...

Maluk sira, imi haree took website CNRT nian nebe dehan:

It is Time for Change!

It is time to save the people of East Timor from political, social and economic atrophy. We need a radical transformation in Government:

From a culture of nepotism to a culture of justice
From a culture of servility to a culture of transparency
From a culture of self-service to a culture of social solidarity
From a culture of power to a culture of serving
From a culture of arrogance to a culture of tolerance
From a culture of corruption to a culture of responsibility

NE"E OMONG KOSONG HOTU TAMBA AGORA NAUK TEN (KKN) MAK NAKONU IHA AMP LARAN!!!!

Anonymous said...

Hau jura, iha eleisaun hau sai la hili partidu sira nebe agora butuk hamutuk iha AMP. Sira ne'e mesak nauk ten e oportunista hotu. Povu tenki hamriik kontra nauk ten sira. Viva povu maubere, a luta continua!!

Husi
Eis AMP anti KKN & oportunistas pro otonomi sira

Anonymous said...

Maluk sira........

Xanana ukun ho AMP iha dalan tolu deit ba oin:

1. Hadia- an laiha KKN investe duni osan ba povo, demiti ka hasai ministros ka deputados AMP sira nebe mak naok 0.15USD, hadia justisa, halo programa ba ema hotu laos dei ba ema AMP, Xanana hatan iha tribunal

2. AMP resigna-an tan imkompentensia lakonsege kontrola gestaun finanseira, husik ministro sira kontinua halo korupsi, korupsi sai merajalela no merakyat.
3. Kontinua kaer ukun to'o ita hotu tama raikuak, ho korupsi buras aumenta, ministros no deputados emprezario balun sai riku matak hodi kontrola maubere oan sira. Halo tusan ba World Bank no IMF

Husi Maubere Foho

Anonymous said...

Comment on Prime Minister’s Statement to the Press on recent allegations of corruption against the Ministry of Finance 12 May 2009

Richard Curtain

Public Policy Consultant
richard@curtain-consulting.net.au

16 May 2009

The Prime Minister’s explanation of the large salaries paid to international advisers in the Ministry of Finance is most revealing about how donor-funded technical assistance works or more accurately does not work. The issue is not corruption but a failure to design the program so that it delivers the results the Government of Timor-Leste wants.

Major failure in program design

The PM’s statement explains in some detail the circumstances but in the end fails to justify in terms of good practice why such high contract fees are paid. The information in the PM’s statement from the full independent review of the Ministry of Finance by the international firm of accountants Deloittes, a report not publicly available as far as I can tell, shows major failures up to 2007 in what the international advisers were asked to do. The lesson the Government should have drawn in designing a new capacity building program was to restructure it so that fees are paid for results.

The contract fees paid to international advisers are excessive because those paying their fees have demanded so little in return. Current arrangements encourage low performance because advisers have a strong interest in making themselves indispensable so their working days are extended.

It is normal practice to pay consultants large fees but this is justified on the basis that the consultant delivers specified outcomes, not just inputs. Consultants with good reputations operate by identifying the problem, offering a solution and agree to be paid when they deliver that solution.

Pay for results

The system of payment for international advisers needs to change from paying people as individuals in the form of employment contracts. Payment should be for one fee-for-service contract to the agency, in this case the World Bank, for managing the project. The service contract should about the delivery of results such as a functioning procurement system, operating to international standards. Payments should be made when specified performance targets are met.

This is the form of contract that these same advisers propose for the delivery of complex services in Timor-Leste such as the national connectivity network. If this type of contract is good enough for the Government to require of other sophisticated service providers in Timor-Leste, it is good enough for its own advisers in the Ministry of Finance.

Donors need to focus on outcomes

The debate over donor-funded payments to international advisers shows the need for an different approach to how aid works in Timor-Leste. An alternative can be called ‘payment for delivery’. This approach proposes that donors pay for each additional improvement made by the aid recipient to achieving an agreed goal. This can apply, for example, to donor funding for increased numbers of children going to and staying in school, or increased access of the rural population to health clinics. Better still, donors could pay for achieved outcomes such as better literacy at each level of schooling, or reduced deaths from childbirth or malaria.

The current way donors operate is to insist on a narrow form of accountability. To minimise the chances for corruption, donors impose an excessive set of controls at each step of the aid delivery process. What is missing is any donor responsibility for the final outcome, as demonstrated by the quote from Deloitte’s independent review of the Public Finance Management Capacity Building Program.

Need to make evaluation results public

The other conclusion for the delivery of aid I draw from the Prime Minister’s statement is the importance of making public all evaluations of aid programs, regardless of their results. This enables lessons to be learned from the successes and the failures. Donors should be required to conduct an impact evaluation of each program they fund. The Government should also ask them to put the details of each program’s proposed evaluation on a public database, stating when it will be completed and giving a date for the public release of the results. Donors cannot expect the Government.